Skip to content

Sitar & sarod

Instruments

Two instruments, one profound tradition.

The Sitar

01

Sitar

The long-necked lute of Hindustani classical music

Description

The sitar is a long-necked plucked lute, usually around four feet in length, built from seasoned toon or teak with a large gourd resonator — the tumba — fixed beneath the neck. Many instruments carry a second, smaller gourd near the pegbox, which adds resonance and helps balance the instrument across the player's foot.

What gives the sitar its unmistakable voice is a combination of three things. The frets, called parda, are curved metal bars tied to the neck with thread; because they are movable, the player can retune them for a particular raga, and because they arch above the fingerboard, a string can be pulled sideways across them to bend a note through five or more scale degrees in a single unbroken gesture. That bend, meend, is the heart of the instrument's expressiveness. Beneath the main strings run eleven to thirteen sympathetic strings, the tarab, which are never struck but vibrate on their own, surrounding every note with a soft halo. And the bridge, the jawari, is deliberately shaped with a shallow curve so the string grazes it as it vibrates, producing the shimmering, overtone-rich buzz that distinguishes the sitar from every other lute in the world.

The player sits cross-legged with the instrument angled across the body, stopping strings with the left index and middle fingers and striking with a mizrab, a curl of wire worn on the right index finger. Of the six or seven playing strings, only one or two carry the melody; the rest are drone and rhythm strings — the chikari — struck in fast, ringing patterns that drive the closing jhala section of a performance.

History

The sitar belongs to a family of long-necked lutes that travelled into the subcontinent from Persia and Central Asia, and its name is generally traced to the Persian sehtar, meaning "three strings." Popular accounts credit its invention to the thirteenth-century poet and musician Amir Khusrau. Most historians treat this as legend: there is no reliable evidence of an instrument resembling the modern sitar before the Mughal period, and the attribution may instead belong to a later musician of the same name at the eighteenth-century Delhi court. The honest position is that the sitar emerged gradually rather than being invented.

By the eighteenth century the instrument had taken recognisable form in northern India, and its repertoire began to be codified. Two composed forms still anchor sitar performance today and carry the names of the musicians associated with them: the slow masitkhani gat, after Masit Khan, and the faster razakhani gat, after Raza Khan. Through the nineteenth century the instrument grew — more sympathetic strings, a wider neck, a heavier gourd — as players sought greater volume and sustain for larger halls.

Two broad approaches to the instrument developed and remain distinct. The Imdadkhani lineage cultivated the gayaki ang, the "singing style," in which the sitar imitates the ornaments and phrasing of the human voice; Vilayat Khan was its towering twentieth-century exponent. The Maihar tradition, shaped by Allauddin Khan, treated the sitar as an instrument in its own right, with a strongly architectural approach to raga development and a debt to the sarod and the been.

That second stream runs directly into this school. Allauddin Khan taught Nikhil Banerjee, whose playing is widely regarded as one of the most complete realisations of the Maihar approach on the sitar, and it is through Nikhil Banerjee and Partho Chatterjee that our own lineage descends. When the sitar reached a global audience in the 1960s it did so largely through musicians of this same tradition — a moment that brought enormous visibility, and with it a lasting popular misunderstanding of the music as exotic decoration rather than a rigorous classical discipline.

The Sarod

02

Sarod

Fretless, resonant, and deeply vocal in character

Description

The sarod is a fretless plucked lute of about three feet, carved from a single block of teak or tun wood, with a waisted body covered by a stretched goatskin soundboard and a small metal resonator mounted near the pegbox. Where the sitar is tall and airy, the sarod is compact and dense, and it sounds that way: darker, weightier, closer to the chest.

Its defining feature is the fingerboard — a polished plate of steel or chrome with no frets at all. The player stops the strings with the nails of the left hand pressed against that metal surface, which means there is nothing to divide one pitch from the next. Every interval can be traversed as a continuous slide, and a phrase can move through a raga without a single audible step. This is what gives the sarod its extraordinary vocal quality, and it is also what makes it unforgiving: with no frets to find, intonation rests entirely in the player's ear and the memory of the hand.

Between four and five main playing strings are joined by two to four chikari drone strings and eleven to sixteen sympathetic tarab strings threaded beneath the fingerboard. The right hand strikes with a java, a plectrum traditionally cut from coconut shell or polished ebony, held between thumb and forefinger. Because the skin soundboard damps the tone more quickly than a wooden one, the sarod sustains less than the sitar — so its players tend to build phrases from weight, attack, and the shape of the slide rather than from ringing decay.

History

The sarod descends from the rabab, a short-necked, skin-faced, fretted lute long established across Afghanistan and the north-western frontier. Musicians from those regions settled in the courts of northern India across the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and it was in their hands that the rabab was rebuilt into something new.

The most widely cited line runs through the Bangash family, Afghan horse traders and musicians who settled at Gwalior; Ghulam Bandegi Khan Bangash and his son Ghulam Ali Khan are generally credited with the decisive steps. A parallel line, associated with Niamatullah Khan, developed the instrument along its own path in the Lucknow and Rampur courts. The two histories are often told competitively, and the surviving record does not settle the matter cleanly — what is clear is that the sarod as we know it took shape through the nineteenth century, not in a single workshop.

The changes that made it were technical and profound. Gut frets were removed and the wooden fingerboard replaced with a metal plate, opening the continuous glissando the instrument is now defined by. Sympathetic strings were added beneath, borrowing from the been and the sitar. Gut playing strings gave way to metal, brightening the attack and increasing volume.

For this school the central figure is Allauddin Khan of Maihar, one of the most consequential musicians of the twentieth century and the founder of our own lineage. A sarod player of formidable command, he was also a teacher of extraordinary reach: his students included his son Ali Akbar Khan, whose recordings introduced the sarod to audiences worldwide, as well as Annapurna Devi, Ravi Shankar, and Nikhil Banerjee. That a single sarod player shaped the modern performance practice of both instruments taught here is not a coincidence — it is the reason the Maihar approach treats sitar and sarod as two voices within one musical grammar. Today the Bangash lineage continues most visibly through Amjad Ali Khan and his sons.

Not sure which to choose?

Most students know within one lesson. Come and try both.

Book a Trial Lesson